Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Boundary Conditions: Pressure head vs. Pervious Layer
Posted 2014年6月12日 GMT-0400下午1:36 Fluid, Subsurface Flow, Modeling Tools, Parameters, Variables, & Functions Version 4.3a 2 Replies
A conditional boundary condition is being used to define pressure head as zero above the water level along the embankment boundary. Below the water level ("load") the pressure head takes into account the y-coordinate (elevation) with respect to the water level. The code to describe this is: "0 + (load-y)*(load >= y)".
Using the pressure head boundary condition along the embankment forces the pressure head at the boundary to be zero. The Phreatic line is forced to the embankment surface because of this boundary condition. We would like the model to calculate the steady state phreatic line within the embankment.
What is the best way to define the boundary condition to allow the model to calculate the zero pressure head within the embankment?
Is the pervious layer boundary condition more applicable to this situation? How is the pervious layer boundary different from the pressure head boundary condition? How do I appropriately apply the conductance and how is Comsol using the conductance value in the model?
Hello Carolyne Bocovich
Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.
If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.