Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年4月19日 GMT-4 14:52
For your question on analyzing lossy conductors normally you would use an impedance boundary condition and select the boundaries you want. However, because the trace that you want in the branch coupler model is considered to be an "interior" trace, as of ver42a you cannot do this yet. From their docs wrt IBC's:
"The Impedance Boundary Condition
is used at boundaries where the field is known to penetrate only a short distance outside the boundary. This penetration is approximated by a boundary condition to avoid the need to include another domain in the model. Although the equation is identical to the one in the low-reflecting boundary condition, it has a different interpretation. The material properties are for the domain outside the boundary and not inside, as for low-reflecting boundaries."
It may be in a later version of the program but who knows when this will happen.
Analyzing really low freqs with the RF module can be tricky. If it was me, I would just use the ACDC module since it may be a little easier setup. Comsol supoprt will tell you that both ACDC and RF use virtually the same equations but there are some details to deal with before being able to use both cases. I don't think there are examples online here. For the branch coupler model, analyzing it at 10kHz seems to be pointless as the circuit is really meant to be at microwave freqs.
For your question on analyzing lossy conductors normally you would use an impedance boundary condition and select the boundaries you want. However, because the trace that you want in the branch coupler model is considered to be an "interior" trace, as of ver42a you cannot do this yet. From their docs wrt IBC's:
"The Impedance Boundary Condition
is used at boundaries where the field is known to penetrate only a short distance outside the boundary. This penetration is approximated by a boundary condition to avoid the need to include another domain in the model. Although the equation is identical to the one in the low-reflecting boundary condition, it has a different interpretation. The material properties are for the domain outside the boundary and not inside, as for low-reflecting boundaries."
It may be in a later version of the program but who knows when this will happen.
Analyzing really low freqs with the RF module can be tricky. If it was me, I would just use the ACDC module since it may be a little easier setup. Comsol supoprt will tell you that both ACDC and RF use virtually the same equations but there are some details to deal with before being able to use both cases. I don't think there are examples online here. For the branch coupler model, analyzing it at 10kHz seems to be pointless as the circuit is really meant to be at microwave freqs.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年4月20日 GMT-4 14:14
Hi Dennis.
thx for your answer. I need to think about this.
I'm using the Brach Line Coupler example, because I'm interested to extract the s-parameters.
Regards,
Matthias
Hi Dennis.
thx for your answer. I need to think about this.
I'm using the Brach Line Coupler example, because I'm interested to extract the s-parameters.
Regards,
Matthias
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年4月20日 GMT-4 14:51
I am not saying that you cannot use the RF module at low freqs. There is a node called "Gauge Fixing" (right click wave equation, electric) that may help with numerical stability. I myself have not used this a whole lot.
From the documentation:
"It is used for numerical stabilization when the frequency is low enough for the total electric
current density related term in the wave equation to become numerically insignificant."
You can definitely extract s-parameters using either module. It is just a matter of determining how best to approach the solution. Maybe you do both to verify that you are getting the same results. Getting all of this setup in comsol can be complicated for a new user.
I was only suggestion that at really low freqs, a branch coupler does not work as advertised. Of course, one could measure this same coupler with a real network analyzer at low freqs and determine this as well.
I am not saying that you cannot use the RF module at low freqs. There is a node called "Gauge Fixing" (right click wave equation, electric) that may help with numerical stability. I myself have not used this a whole lot.
From the documentation:
"It is used for numerical stabilization when the frequency is low enough for the total electric
current density related term in the wave equation to become numerically insignificant."
You can definitely extract s-parameters using either module. It is just a matter of determining how best to approach the solution. Maybe you do both to verify that you are getting the same results. Getting all of this setup in comsol can be complicated for a new user.
I was only suggestion that at really low freqs, a branch coupler does not work as advertised. Of course, one could measure this same coupler with a real network analyzer at low freqs and determine this as well.