Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Physics in 3D after revolution of a 2D plane
Posted 2012年4月27日 GMT-4 05:10 Fluid & Heat, Geometry, Materials, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi,
Using Fluid Dynamics I want to create a 3D geometry by revolving a 2D plane. If I do so, it is not possible to change the boundary and subdomain settings in physics. (You can't click on these options they are grey). Even for simple geometries like a cylinder made by revolving a 2D plane this is not possible.
Is there somting I have to adjust after revolve a 2D geometry to 3D bevore I can change the subdomain and boundary settings in 3D?
Thanks, Til
Using Fluid Dynamics I want to create a 3D geometry by revolving a 2D plane. If I do so, it is not possible to change the boundary and subdomain settings in physics. (You can't click on these options they are grey). Even for simple geometries like a cylinder made by revolving a 2D plane this is not possible.
Is there somting I have to adjust after revolve a 2D geometry to 3D bevore I can change the subdomain and boundary settings in 3D?
Thanks, Til
1 Reply Last Post 2012年4月27日 GMT-4 07:34
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Hi
3.5 is getting old, but normally you can make a 3D geoemtry nicely by revolving a 2D workplane. Perhaps one thing, check that it becomes a "solid" or "convert" it to a 3D solid, because else COMSOl does not recognise the domain and boundaries
--
Good luck
Ivar
3.5 is getting old, but normally you can make a 3D geoemtry nicely by revolving a 2D workplane. Perhaps one thing, check that it becomes a "solid" or "convert" it to a 3D solid, because else COMSOl does not recognise the domain and boundaries
--
Good luck
Ivar