Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 months ago
2024年12月4日 GMT+8 08:29
Updated:
9 months ago
2024年12月4日 GMT+8 08:36
If your physics is entirely linear (and I suspect it is), then you can combine the two separately computed results just as you described, working in the frequency domain. If there are any non-linear effects of significance, then you need to do this in time domain. (Note: I am assuming you are presently attempting to do this in the frequency domain.) Now, assuming linearity holds, if the outcomes in your model "seem incorrect" to you, then: (1) there may be one or more errors somewhere in the setup of the problem, involving one or both of the two frequencies, and/or in how you endeavored to combine the results, either in post-processing or elsewhere; or (2) another possibility is that the result that concerns you may actually be correct, but is also different from what you expected. To get this resolved, I suggest you post your .mph file to the forum so that other Comsol users reading this can take a look at it and offer you suggestions specific to your model and physics.
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
If your physics is entirely linear (and I *suspect* it is), then you can combine the two separately computed results just as you described, working in the frequency domain. If there are any non-linear effects of significance, then you need to do this in time domain. (Note: I am *assuming* you are presently attempting to do this in the frequency domain.) Now, assuming linearity holds, if the outcomes in your model "seem incorrect" to you, then: (1) there may be one or more errors somewhere in the setup of the problem, involving one or both of the two frequencies, and/or in how you endeavored to combine the results, either in post-processing or elsewhere; or (2) another possibility is that the result that concerns you may actually be correct, but is also different from what you expected. To get this resolved, I suggest you post your .mph file to the forum so that other Comsol users reading this can take a look at it and offer you suggestions specific to your model and physics.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 months ago
2025年1月17日 GMT+8 05:16
Thank you so much for your support.
Thank you so much for your support.
Acculution ApS
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 months ago
2025年1月17日 GMT+8 15:08
First, you need to make sure that you actually get the mathematics of what you want to do. In the attached picture it is seemingly a 'superposition of phasors that have two slightly different frequencies', and so that suggests a sum, in which case you can do what Robert says, and run each frequency on its own and then combine studies to get the full solution. But the attached picture also mentions E_AM, suggesting Amplitude Modulation, which in turn would imply a multiplication, in which case you need a time domain solution.
Try setting up two analytical solutions in COMSOL (no FEM), and compare
sin(100[Hz]t)+sin(101[Hz]t)
and
sin(100[Hz]t)sin(1[Hz]*t)
and look at the frequency content of each of them. I sounds like you want to do the former of the two, but make sure.
-------------------
René Christensen, PhD
Acculution ApS
www.acculution.com
info@acculution.com
First, you need to make sure that you actually get the mathematics of what you want to do. In the attached picture it is seemingly a 'superposition of phasors that have two slightly different frequencies', and so that suggests a sum, in which case you can do what Robert says, and run each frequency on its own and then combine studies to get the full solution. But the attached picture also mentions E_AM, suggesting Amplitude Modulation, which in turn would imply a multiplication, in which case you need a time domain solution.
Try setting up two analytical solutions in COMSOL (no FEM), and compare
sin(100[Hz]*t)+sin(101[Hz]*t)
and
sin(100[Hz]*t)*sin(1[Hz]*t)
and look at the frequency content of each of them. I sounds like you want to do the former of the two, but make sure.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
6 months ago
2025年2月19日 GMT+8 22:34
Thank you so much @René Christensen, PhD.
Thank you so much @René Christensen, PhD.