Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
查找

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Permanent magnet constitutive relation

Posted 2010年9月9日 GMT-4 01:43 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics 1 Reply

Millicent Chan
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hey guys!

I'm trying to model a system of permanent magnets and was just wondering what the constitutive relation should be used: the magnetisation one B = \mu_0H + \mu_0M, or the remanent flux one B = µ_0µ_rH + ???B_r ?
From what I've seen, both seem to be used in the literature...

Thanks for the help :)
- Milly
1 Reply Last Post 2010年9月10日 GMT-4 04:43
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 2010年9月10日 GMT-4 04:43
Hi

both are equivalent if you apply the physics correctly and you input the correct values, I mostly use the Magnetisation fr permanent magnets, as it's often what I have as "correct" specified values

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi both are equivalent if you apply the physics correctly and you input the correct values, I mostly use the Magnetisation fr permanent magnets, as it's often what I have as "correct" specified values -- Good luck Ivar

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content