Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
查找

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Can 3D geometry only simulate 1/4 of it?

Posted 2016年6月23日 GMT-4 11:32 Geometry Version 5.2 3 Replies

Sandra Wang
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I have a geometry which in not asymmetry 2D, but symmetry in mirror. In order to reduce the computation power, may I only simulate 1/4 of it? Thank you for your attention!
3 Replies Last Post 2016年6月25日 GMT-4 10:13
Daniel Connelly
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 2016年6月24日 GMT-4 13:14
Yes -- these are standard reflective boundary conditions. However, it won't work for solutions which allow for antisymmetric solutions, like eigenmode analysis or Schrödinger's Equation. You'd only solve for 1/4 of the available solutions.
Yes -- these are standard reflective boundary conditions. However, it won't work for solutions which allow for antisymmetric solutions, like eigenmode analysis or Schrödinger's Equation. You'd only solve for 1/4 of the available solutions.
Jeff Hiller COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 2016年6月24日 GMT-4 14:02
There are ways of handling even antisymmetric solutions.
For a solid discussion of this, see www.comsol.com/support/knowledgebase/1038/
Best,
Jeff
There are ways of handling even antisymmetric solutions. For a solid discussion of this, see https://www.comsol.com/support/knowledgebase/1038/ Best, Jeff
Daniel Connelly
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 2016年6月25日 GMT-4 10:13
Thanks for posting that! So to calculate the number of modes you'd need all combinations of symmetric and antisymmetric boundaries (2ⁿ, where n is the number of boundaries), unless certain combinations are degenerate.

This still wouldn't work with "pie-slice" examples like the one on that web page, though.
Thanks for posting that! So to calculate the number of modes you'd need all combinations of symmetric and antisymmetric boundaries (2ⁿ, where n is the number of boundaries), unless certain combinations are degenerate. This still wouldn't work with "pie-slice" examples like the one on that web page, though.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content