Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
2019年11月13日 GMT-5 02:21
Hi Aman,
The reference temperature serves two purposes. The first one is the more obvious: it is the temperature at which there is no thermal strain in a solid. The thermal strain is computed as
The other purpose, also related to solid mechanics, is that the reference temperature at which the mass density is evaluated (if it is temperature dependent). For a physics interface which is formulated on the material frame, mass conservation dictates that the density must be constant during the simulation. Volume changes due to thermal expansion are taken care of only through the thermal strain. Any physics interface which is formulated on the material frame must have this interpretation of mass density.
The latter case can be thought of as "the reference temperature is the temperature at which the geometry is exactly the one I modeled".
The opposite case you can find in for example fluid dynamics where a fixed control volume is studied ('Eulerian formulation'). In this case, the mass of the fluid inside the control volume can change, and a truly temperature dependent density is appropriate. The reference temperature is irrelevant here.
Regards,
Henrik
-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
Hi Aman,
The reference temperature serves two purposes. The first one is the more obvious: it is the temperature at which there is no thermal strain in a solid. The thermal strain is computed as
\epsilon_{th} = \alpha (T-T_{ref})
The other purpose, also related to solid mechanics, is that the reference temperature at which the mass density is evaluated (if it is temperature dependent). For a physics interface which is formulated on the *material frame*, mass conservation dictates that the density must be constant during the simulation. Volume changes due to thermal expansion are taken care of only through the thermal strain. Any physics interface which is formulated on the material frame must have this interpretation of mass density.
The latter case can be thought of as "the reference temperature is the temperature at which the geometry is exactly the one I modeled".
The opposite case you can find in for example fluid dynamics where a fixed control volume is studied ('Eulerian formulation'). In this case, the mass of the fluid inside the control volume can change, and a truly temperature dependent density is appropriate. The reference temperature is irrelevant here.
Regards,
Henrik