Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年2月17日 GMT-5 01:43
Why don't you use the general form ?
Why don't you use the general form ?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年2月17日 GMT-5 08:26
have you tried to put dp/dx as the source term 'f' in the coefficient form? Correct me if I'm wrong: source term can be anything, the Comsol solver will deal with it.
have you tried to put dp/dx as the source term 'f' in the coefficient form? Correct me if I'm wrong: source term can be anything, the Comsol solver will deal with it.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年2月17日 GMT-5 09:18
Hi Murali, I can't see how that would change things... the general form should just be the compact version of the Coefficient Form PDE.
Hi Murali, I can't see how that would change things... the general form should just be the compact version of the Coefficient Form PDE.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年2月17日 GMT-5 09:23
Ah, I think I get what you are saying is that I should rewrite things like:
dv/dt + v*dv/dx +dp/dx = 0 ==>
1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -1/v * dp/dx ==>
1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -K/v , where: dp/dx = K
So I just add another equation! Well I think this trick should work.
Thanks Francois.
Ah, I think I get what you are saying is that I should rewrite things like:
dv/dt + v*dv/dx +dp/dx = 0 ==>
1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -1/v * dp/dx ==>
1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -K/v , where: dp/dx = K
So I just add another equation! Well I think this trick should work.
Thanks Francois.