Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
查找

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Equation of relative permitivitty as a function of refractive indices.

Posted 2020年10月3日 GMT-4 19:04 2 Replies

Israel Alves Oliveira
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Good night!

I would like to know why the equation is of relative permitivitty as a function of the refractive indices in the COMSOL differs from that of the literature.

epsilon_r: (n - k)² = (n² + k²) - 2ink - Comsol

epsilon_r: (n² - k²) + 2ink - Literature.

Thank you!

2 Replies Last Post 2020年10月3日 GMT-4 22:01
Robert Koslover Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 2020年10月3日 GMT-4 21:31

Hmm.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index#Complex_refractive_index This may have to do with the choice of the sign in the exp(i omega t) term?

-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Hmm. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index#Complex_refractive_index This may have to do with the choice of the sign in the exp(i omega t) term?
Israel Alves Oliveira
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 2020年10月3日 GMT-4 22:01

It may be because of the harmonic response in metamaterials. I have to investigate further. Thank you!

It may be because of the harmonic response in metamaterials. I have to investigate further. Thank you!

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content