Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
查找

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

shell-beam vs solid for eigenanalysis

Posted 2022年11月26日 GMT-5 00:25 Version 6.1 2 Replies

Panson Poon
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I created a table based on using either solid interface or shell-beam interface. Bottom boundaries/points of the solid legs/beams are fixed.

I expect both should result in closely agreed mode frequencies. However, the first and second mode frequencies are considerably different.

Is there anything wrong in the model?

2 Replies Last Post 2022年12月1日 GMT-5 21:07
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 2 years ago 2022年11月28日 GMT-5 07:19

The setting for Connected region in Shell-Beam Connection is wrong. Try Distance (automatic) instead.

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
The setting for *Connected region* in *Shell-Beam Connection* is wrong. Try *Distance (automatic)* instead.
Panson Poon
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 2 years ago 2022年12月1日 GMT-5 21:07

Thank you.

Thank you.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content