Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 months ago
2024年5月22日 GMT-4 08:36
Something is not right with the physics and modeling here. If your frequnecy is 48 kHz, then you need a time step in the order of 1 microsecond to resolve each period. It will be difficult to run an analysis for 120 seconds, since that would require > 100 million time steps.
-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
Something is not right with the physics and modeling here. If your frequnecy is 48 kHz, then you need a time step in the order of 1 microsecond to resolve each period. It will be difficult to run an analysis for 120 seconds, since that would require > 100 million time steps.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 months ago
2024年5月22日 GMT-4 21:23
Something is not right with the physics and modeling here. If your frequnecy is 48 kHz, then you need a time step in the order of 1 microsecond to resolve each period. It will be difficult to run an analysis for 120 seconds, since that would require > 100 million time steps.
Thanks, I got your point. I changed the time step to 100ms and frequency to 5 Hz, now I am getting the voltage graph (I was just checking the output).
You mentioned that 120s and 48KHz setting is hard to get. What does this mean, are you talking about the computational cost?
If I want to mimic RF ablation, which runs on 480KHz, then, what will be optimal setting?
Thanks in advance.
>Something is not right with the physics and modeling here. If your frequnecy is 48 kHz, then you need a time step in the order of 1 microsecond to resolve each period. It will be difficult to run an analysis for 120 seconds, since that would require > 100 million time steps.
Thanks, I got your point. I changed the time step to 100ms and frequency to 5 Hz, now I am getting the voltage graph (I was just checking the output).
You mentioned that 120s and 48KHz setting is hard to get. What does this mean, are you talking about the computational cost?
If I want to mimic RF ablation, which runs on 480KHz, then, what will be optimal setting?
Thanks in advance.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 months ago
2024年5月23日 GMT-4 01:58
Some blog articles that may help:
https://www.comsol.com/blogs/modeling-periodic-electric-signals-and-their-thermal-effects
https://www.comsol.com/blogs/study-radiofrequency-tissue-ablation-using-simulation
https://www.comsol.com/blogs/modeling-thermal-ablation-for-material-removal
Some blog articles that may help:
https://www.comsol.com/blogs/modeling-periodic-electric-signals-and-their-thermal-effects
https://www.comsol.com/blogs/study-radiofrequency-tissue-ablation-using-simulation
https://www.comsol.com/blogs/modeling-thermal-ablation-for-material-removal
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 months ago
2024年5月23日 GMT-4 16:19
The frequency-transient analysis step mentioned in the second article cited by Mark may well be appropriate. This depends on whether the time dependence of the heating within a cycle is material to the problem.
Such an approach is commonly used for RF heating where the RF frequency is MHz and the heat transport problem takes place over seconds.
The frequency-transient analysis step mentioned in the second article cited by Mark may well be appropriate. This depends on whether the time dependence of the heating within a cycle is material to the problem.
Such an approach is commonly used for RF heating where the RF frequency is MHz and the heat transport problem takes place over seconds.