Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Model coupling from 2D-axi to 3D in fluid flow
Posted 2013年4月15日 GMT-4 03:23 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Geometry, Mesh, Parameters, Variables, & Functions Version 4.3 0 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I'm simulating an electrostatic precipitator, as uploaded picture.
In this, the geometry can be considered as a symmetric cylinder, so I think the laminar flow module can be solved in 2D-axisymmetric model, and this result can be reasonable compared to the real physics.
However, particle tracing module in 2D-axi doesn't seem to follow the real physics.
So here, I want to simulate laminar flow module in 2D-axi, and particle tracing module in 3D.
Integration coupling variables can be a good method for this, but it does not give me a good result.
Is there anybody who can deal with this problem?
Or, just you can suggest any opinion^^ I want to listen to many thinking of you.
Take care
CH2
Attachments:
Hello Chang-Ho Han
Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.
If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.