Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Modeling a Gaussian beam
Posted 2014年8月26日 GMT-4 13:20 RF & Microwave Engineering, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions 2 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hello everyone,
could somebody explain to me why in the COMSOL example "Nanorods" the equation for the incoming electric field (a z-polarized gaussian beam in 2D) reads
sqrt(w0/w(y))*exp(-(x/w(y))^2)*exp(j*k*x^2/(2*R(y)))*exp(j*(k*y-0.5 atan(y/z0)))
which is different from the usual definition of a gaussian beam (e.g. on wikipedia) by a square root ( "sqrt(w0/w(y))" instead of "w0/w(y)" and a factor in front of the "atan(y/z0)"?
In the example "Second harmonic generation of a gaussian beam" they use the same definition (but in the time domain).
Thank you for your help!
could somebody explain to me why in the COMSOL example "Nanorods" the equation for the incoming electric field (a z-polarized gaussian beam in 2D) reads
sqrt(w0/w(y))*exp(-(x/w(y))^2)*exp(j*k*x^2/(2*R(y)))*exp(j*(k*y-0.5 atan(y/z0)))
which is different from the usual definition of a gaussian beam (e.g. on wikipedia) by a square root ( "sqrt(w0/w(y))" instead of "w0/w(y)" and a factor in front of the "atan(y/z0)"?
In the example "Second harmonic generation of a gaussian beam" they use the same definition (but in the time domain).
Thank you for your help!
2 Replies Last Post 2014年9月2日 GMT-4 06:31