Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
7 years ago
2017年11月27日 GMT-5 09:25
Updated:
7 years ago
2017年11月27日 GMT-5 10:17
Hello Hossein,
In some cases, the solution of a PDE is independent of the material properties.
In your case, it sounds like you're solving the steady-state electric currents equation with a spatially-independent conductivity
, and with your boundary conditions being all Dirichlet or zero flux. In that case, you can see that
, the conductivity, is the only material property that appears in the equation and the BCs, and that it can actually be removed from the equation (because
is spatially-independent and can therefore be taken out of the divergence and eliminated from the equation by dividing both sides by
) and the BCs (by dividing both sides of those BCs by
).
Best regards,
Jeff
PS: While in your model the voltage and electric potential (which is defined solely in terms of the voltage) do not depend on
, some other quantities do, for instance the current density.
-------------------
Jeff Hiller
Hello Hossein,
In some cases, the solution of a PDE is independent of the material properties.
In your case, it sounds like you're solving the steady-state electric currents equation with a spatially-independent conductivity \sigma, and with your boundary conditions being all Dirichlet or zero flux. In that case, you can see that \sigma, the conductivity, is the only material property that appears in the equation and the BCs, and that it can actually be removed from the equation (because \sigma is spatially-independent and can therefore be taken out of the divergence and eliminated from the equation by dividing both sides by \sigma) and the BCs (by dividing both sides of those BCs by \sigma).
Best regards,
Jeff
PS: While in your model the voltage and electric potential (which is defined solely in terms of the voltage) do not depend on \sigma, some other quantities do, for instance the current density.