Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
6 years ago
2018年6月17日 GMT-4 04:10
I think you should try first given examples in RF module to understand basics and then try yours own model.
I think you should try first given examples in RF module to understand basics and then try yours own model.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
6 years ago
2018年7月5日 GMT-4 23:58
Hi José,
I would not try a user-defined port first. It mostly depends on your structure, for example a rectangle in 2D is a simplified model for a rectangular waveguide. Hence, if the field goes to 0 immediatly, I would think that this is because you are sending a mode that cannot propagate into your rectangle.
You can try a numeric port, but if you want to be more specific, I would go first for a rectangular port, using a TE10 mode, or a TM11 modes (they have the lowest cutoff frequencies in a rectangular waveguide). Hence, you are not obliged to specify the components of E.
Another solution might be that you are propagating at the wrong frequency. Because your waveguide is finite, I would do an eigenmode study first, then pick a good frequency (lowest imaginary part and which looks like a TE or TM or whatever mode you are sending), and then do the Frequency domain study with this frequency as an input. That will ensure you that this frequency is allowed to propagate.
I don't know if you did but don't forget so specify a Boundary Mode Analysis in your study, not for the eigenfrequency study but before the Frequency domain step in the other study.
About the boundary conditions, a PEC is appropriate as long as your are propagating in a metal : it will reflect everything. Otherwise, if it is not a metal, I would put the structure in a box of air, with scattering boundary conditions on the sides to absorb the field (and add PML around if you want).
Attached is a TE10 mode propagating in a semiconducture waveguide, surrounding by air and with PML to give you an example. I did it in 3D.
Best,
François Swiadek
Hi José,
I would not try a user-defined port first. It mostly depends on your structure, for example a rectangle in 2D is a simplified model for a rectangular waveguide. Hence, if the field goes to 0 immediatly, I would think that this is because you are sending a mode that cannot propagate into your rectangle.
You can try a numeric port, but if you want to be more specific, I would go first for a rectangular port, using a TE10 mode, or a TM11 modes (they have the lowest cutoff frequencies in a rectangular waveguide). Hence, you are not obliged to specify the components of E.
Another solution might be that you are propagating at the wrong frequency. Because your waveguide is finite, I would do an eigenmode study first, then pick a good frequency (lowest imaginary part and which looks like a TE or TM or whatever mode you are sending), and then do the Frequency domain study with this frequency as an input. That will ensure you that this frequency is allowed to propagate.
I don't know if you did but don't forget so specify a Boundary Mode Analysis in your study, not for the eigenfrequency study but before the Frequency domain step in the other study.
About the boundary conditions, a PEC is appropriate as long as your are propagating in a metal : it will reflect everything. Otherwise, if it is not a metal, I would put the structure in a box of air, with scattering boundary conditions on the sides to absorb the field (and add PML around if you want).
Attached is a TE10 mode propagating in a semiconducture waveguide, surrounding by air and with PML to give you an example. I did it in 3D.
Best,
François Swiadek
Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
6 years ago
2018年7月11日 GMT-4 13:25
Updated:
6 years ago
2018年7月11日 GMT-4 13:27
If you want to generate/apply an open-space plane wave, consider using the scattered wave formulation (a background wave) instead of attempting to launch a plane wave from a port. And, in that case, don't use PECs for the boundary conditions anywhere that they wouldn't already be a perfect fit to the plane wave in question.
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
If you want to generate/apply an open-space plane wave, consider using the scattered wave formulation (a background wave) instead of attempting to launch a plane wave from a port. And, in that case, don't use PECs for the boundary conditions anywhere that they wouldn't already be a perfect fit to the plane wave in question.