Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2011年12月31日 GMT-5 10:29
Hi,
The very first question that comes to my mind is how did you define the inlet velocity? Why is there an arrow in the middle of your domain?
Cheers
Hi,
The very first question that comes to my mind is how did you define the inlet velocity? Why is there an arrow in the middle of your domain?
Cheers
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2011年12月31日 GMT-5 10:35
Hi
And are you sure your blade curatures shoud not be inversed, the slope seems odd, for a centrifugal pump.
But you can also mirror the outlet to have it going "down", without changing other things in your
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
And are you sure your blade curatures shoud not be inversed, the slope seems odd, for a centrifugal pump.
But you can also mirror the outlet to have it going "down", without changing other things in your
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年1月5日 GMT-5 09:11
Dear Amir,
I defined the inlet velocity as a normal inflow option on the boundary that is shown by the arrow. Arrows are only for showing the boundaries. They are not in the model.
Hi,
The very first question that comes to my mind is how did you define the inlet velocity? Why is there an arrow in the middle of your domain?
Cheers
Dear Amir,
I defined the inlet velocity as a normal inflow option on the boundary that is shown by the arrow. Arrows are only for showing the boundaries. They are not in the model.
[QUOTE]
Hi,
The very first question that comes to my mind is how did you define the inlet velocity? Why is there an arrow in the middle of your domain?
Cheers
[/QUOTE]
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年1月5日 GMT-5 09:12
Dear Ivar,
I ran the analyse as you suggested but nothing changed. I think the curvatures of blades are correct. They are as in the literature.
Hi
And are you sure your blade curatures shoud not be inversed, the slope seems odd, for a centrifugal pump.
But you can also mirror the outlet to have it going "down", without changing other things in your
--
Good luck
Ivar
Dear Ivar,
I ran the analyse as you suggested but nothing changed. I think the curvatures of blades are correct. They are as in the literature.
[QUOTE]
Hi
And are you sure your blade curatures shoud not be inversed, the slope seems odd, for a centrifugal pump.
But you can also mirror the outlet to have it going "down", without changing other things in your
--
Good luck
Ivar
[/QUOTE]
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年1月5日 GMT-5 10:20
Hi
for the curvature it might be OK, it just puzzled me at first.
To get it solving, I'm not sure what to propose, I got something like that running once in 3.5 a few years ago, not sure where I have it, and I have seen a v4 model pass by, again not sure where to look for that one, normally v4 should be better than V3.5 anyhow ;)
Sorry cannot do much more
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
for the curvature it might be OK, it just puzzled me at first.
To get it solving, I'm not sure what to propose, I got something like that running once in 3.5 a few years ago, not sure where I have it, and I have seen a v4 model pass by, again not sure where to look for that one, normally v4 should be better than V3.5 anyhow ;)
Sorry cannot do much more
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年1月5日 GMT-5 15:44
Hi,
I am sorry I have not been clearer before. How did you define the inlet velocity? Has it got just a radial component? And if so did you define a vector field or just the overall scalar value? How did you define the rotating domain? Does it just rotate on its own or is it related to the inlet velocity?
There is no boundary mesh, I would recommend one. The overall mesh seems a bit coarse given the high value of rounds per minute.
Finally, in 4.2 you can't virtually get convergence for high rpms, i.e. turbulent flow, I don't remember about 3.5.
Cheers
Hi,
I am sorry I have not been clearer before. How did you define the inlet velocity? Has it got just a radial component? And if so did you define a vector field or just the overall scalar value? How did you define the rotating domain? Does it just rotate on its own or is it related to the inlet velocity?
There is no boundary mesh, I would recommend one. The overall mesh seems a bit coarse given the high value of rounds per minute.
Finally, in 4.2 you can't virtually get convergence for high rpms, i.e. turbulent flow, I don't remember about 3.5.
Cheers