Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
2 years ago
2022年10月10日 GMT-4 11:57
Hi William,
Why not make the material property(ies) function(s) of time (t) instead of using parameters? This way you wouldn't even ned to pause the run at 10[ns].
Jeff
-------------------
Jeff Hiller
Hi William,
Why not make the material property(ies) function(s) of time (t) instead of using parameters? This way you wouldn't even ned to pause the run at 10[ns].
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
2 years ago
2022年10月10日 GMT-4 12:06
Hi William,
Why not make the material property(ies) function(s) of time (t) instead of using parameters? This way you wouldn't even ned to pause the run at 10[ns].
Jeff
Hi Jeff, I thought of this idea but I run into two proiblems. 1) I don't have an analytical expression of what the conductivity should be at various points. The change is dependent on the results of the system. 2) I don't necessarily know WHEN the properties should change.
>Hi William,
>
>Why not make the material property(ies) function(s) of time (t) instead of using parameters? This way you wouldn't even ned to pause the run at 10[ns].
>
>Jeff
Hi Jeff, I thought of this idea but I run into two proiblems. 1) I don't have an analytical expression of what the conductivity should be at various points. The change is dependent on the results of the system. 2) I don't necessarily know WHEN the properties should change.
Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
2 years ago
2022年10月10日 GMT-4 13:25
Updated:
2 years ago
2022年10月10日 GMT-4 13:42
OK, but you could still define your conductivity using a single expression that switches between two different expressions (which don't have to be analytical - could be interpolation functions) depending on whether your particular criterion (which does not need to be explicitly defined as a time) is reached. Something conceptually like this:
expression1+(expression2-expression1)*criterion
In any case, as an alternative approach, you may also want to look into Events, see this blog for an example.
Best,
Jeff
-------------------
Jeff Hiller
OK, but you could still define your conductivity using a single expression that switches between two different expressions (which don't have to be analytical - could be interpolation functions) depending on whether your particular criterion (which does not need to be explicitly defined as a time) is reached. Something conceptually like this:
expression1+(expression2-expression1)*criterion
In any case, as an alternative approach, you may also want to look into Events, see [this blog](https://www.comsol.com/blogs/implementing-a-thermostat-with-the-events-interface/) for an example.
Best,
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
2 years ago
2022年10月10日 GMT-4 13:41
OK, but you could still define your conductivity using a single expression that switches between two different expressions (which don't have to be analytical - could be interpolation functions) depending on whether your particular criterion (which does not need to be explicitly defined as a time) is reached.
In any case, as an alternative approach, you may also want to look into Events, see this blog for an example.
Best,
Jeff
Jeff, This looks like a promising potential tool and may be exactly what I'm looking for. Thank you for this!!!
>OK, but you could still define your conductivity using a single expression that switches between two different expressions (which don't have to be analytical - could be interpolation functions) depending on whether your particular criterion (which does not need to be explicitly defined as a time) is reached.
>
>In any case, as an alternative approach, you may also want to look into Events, see [this blog](https://www.comsol.com/blogs/implementing-a-thermostat-with-the-events-interface/) for an example.
>
>Best,
>
>Jeff
Jeff, This looks like a promising potential tool and may be exactly what I'm looking for. Thank you for this!!!