Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2013年12月5日 GMT-5 02:05
Hey,
positiv or negativ? your potential? hopefully positive.. check your potentials at all walls.. you may miss a loss mechanism somewhere. Isn't the secondary emission coefficient of electrons high? 0.25? (0,1 is my value, forgot where i found this)
do you know the meaning of the -11.5 (electron energy)/ 0 (collision cross section) in the first row of the cross-section table of the Ar metastable relaxation with electrons? (e+Ars=>e+Ar)
thank you,
lukas
Hey,
positiv or negativ? your potential? hopefully positive.. check your potentials at all walls.. you may miss a loss mechanism somewhere. Isn't the secondary emission coefficient of electrons high? 0.25? (0,1 is my value, forgot where i found this)
do you know the meaning of the -11.5 (electron energy)/ 0 (collision cross section) in the first row of the cross-section table of the Ar metastable relaxation with electrons? (e+Ars=>e+Ar)
thank you,
lukas
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2014年1月9日 GMT-5 07:48
Hej, I am sorry for answearing that late...
I have tried out many things, but the problem with to high (negative) potential stays the same. I have implemented elctron losses at all walls of the tube (reflectio=0 and no sencondary emission) exept 1, there is total electron reflection. The ions (tritium ions) get absorbed at all walls through a wall reaction (T+=>T) .
Does all Ions an the wall get absorbed if I set the sticking coefficient to be 1? (I need that full absorbtion at the walls...)
In reality there is an outflow of tritium and tritium ions in tube direction and T+ absorbtion (neutralization) at the side walls.
There should be something like a saturation in Electron (and ion) density but even after 5 seconds the electron density growths further. I checked the situation with the Drift Diffusion Plasma (this is without ions) and there everything looks fine (saturation of electron density, reasonable potential distribution)
So can you tell me why my electron density doesn't saturate in the DC Discharge plasma?
Thanks
Laura
Hej, I am sorry for answearing that late...
I have tried out many things, but the problem with to high (negative) potential stays the same. I have implemented elctron losses at all walls of the tube (reflectio=0 and no sencondary emission) exept 1, there is total electron reflection. The ions (tritium ions) get absorbed at all walls through a wall reaction (T+=>T) .
Does all Ions an the wall get absorbed if I set the sticking coefficient to be 1? (I need that full absorbtion at the walls...)
In reality there is an outflow of tritium and tritium ions in tube direction and T+ absorbtion (neutralization) at the side walls.
There should be something like a saturation in Electron (and ion) density but even after 5 seconds the electron density growths further. I checked the situation with the Drift Diffusion Plasma (this is without ions) and there everything looks fine (saturation of electron density, reasonable potential distribution)
So can you tell me why my electron density doesn't saturate in the DC Discharge plasma?
Thanks
Laura