Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

PEC/PMC on the boundaries of the cubic unit cell

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

How one can apply the boundary conditions or PEC/PMC on the boundaries of the cubic unit cell if the angle of polarization of the incident electromagnetic wave is rotating? For example, the angle changes from 0 to 90 degrees with an interval of 10 degrees.


3 Replies Last Post 2018年9月20日 GMT-4 14:40
Robert Koslover Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 6 years ago 2018年9月16日 GMT-4 18:08
Updated: 6 years ago 2018年9月16日 GMT-4 18:15

In most geometries, such as in a cube, those boundaries would be inconsistent with a rotating field. The PEC boundary will not support a tangential component of E. The PMC boundary will not support a tangential component of H. You need to decide what you are actually trying to model. Is it the rotating field? If so, then you need to choose boundaries that correspond to that. Or is it the certain PEC and PMC boundaries that you want to preserve? Then you need to expect, input, and/or solve for fields that will be consistent with those boundaries.

Note: If your goal is to impose a plane wave at an arbitrary angle inside the cube, consider using the "scattered field formulation." (Look in Settings, under EM Waves, Frequency Domain.) In that approach, you specify a volumetric background field instead, and this simplifies the work you need to do in regard to setting up the boundary conditions.

-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
In most geometries, such as in a cube, those boundaries would be inconsistent with a rotating field. The PEC boundary will not support a tangential component of E. The PMC boundary will not support a tangential component of H. You need to decide what you are actually trying to model. Is it the rotating field? If so, then you need to choose boundaries that correspond to that. Or is it the certain PEC and PMC boundaries that you want to preserve? Then you need to expect, input, and/or solve for fields that will be consistent with those boundaries. Note: If your goal is to impose a plane wave at an arbitrary angle inside the cube, consider using the "scattered field formulation." (Look in Settings, under EM Waves, Frequency Domain.) In that approach, you specify a volumetric background field instead, and this simplifies the work you need to do in regard to setting up the boundary conditions.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 6 years ago 2018年9月18日 GMT-4 02:54

Thank you Sir. It will be really useful info.

Thank you Sir. It will be really useful info.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 6 years ago 2018年9月20日 GMT-4 14:40

Sir, Could you please guide me in such a case which boundary conditions are suitable? I want to calculate reflection or S11 parameter by applying port 1 for excitation of the plane wave, but bit confuse about choosing the right BCs since the field is rotating.

Sir, Could you please guide me in such a case which boundary conditions are suitable? I want to calculate reflection or S11 parameter by applying port 1 for excitation of the plane wave, but bit confuse about choosing the right BCs since the field is rotating.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.