Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Potential distribution in the Insulation boundaries.
Posted 2017年5月18日 GMT-4 02:37 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi all
I'm working with Electrostatic Module, but when I get the 1D - Line plot for Electrical Potential distribution a long x-axis ( x=from 0 to 80 um, y=0 ), the plot likes " potential.pgn" image.
I just think that in the boundaries set by Zero Charge ( that means " Insulation boundaries ), the potential is totally "Zero", but in my case, this figure is not Zero, it seem to be slight decrease.
Does anyone help to to clear my problem ? Thanks in advanced
I'm working with Electrostatic Module, but when I get the 1D - Line plot for Electrical Potential distribution a long x-axis ( x=from 0 to 80 um, y=0 ), the plot likes " potential.pgn" image.
I just think that in the boundaries set by Zero Charge ( that means " Insulation boundaries ), the potential is totally "Zero", but in my case, this figure is not Zero, it seem to be slight decrease.
Does anyone help to to clear my problem ? Thanks in advanced
Attachments:
1 Reply Last Post 2017年5月18日 GMT-4 11:07
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
A "zero charge" boundary condition simply does not force the potential to be zero. For example, consider a point charge in empty space. There is no charge anywhere except the point. But the potential falls off radially (as 1/r) away from the charge; there are spherical constant-potential surfaces around the charge. As another simple example, consider an idealized parallel plate capacitor: the potential varies linearly along any perpendicular line between the two plates. This corresponds to a constant E field from one plate to the other. You may wish to read/review an introduction to electrostatics. Many are available on the internet.