Sergei Yushanov
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2012年12月24日 GMT-5 08:29
Reflection and transmission through air/metal/dielectric layers is classical surface plasmon phenomena in Kretschmann-Raether configuration and is governed by evanescent wave propagation at the metal/dielectric interface:
www.ece.rutgers.edu/~orfanidi/ewa/ch08.pdf
Also, search Comsol’ Papers and Presentations website:
www.comsol.com/search/?s=surface+plasmon
Regards,
Sergei
Reflection and transmission through air/metal/dielectric layers is classical surface plasmon phenomena in Kretschmann-Raether configuration and is governed by evanescent wave propagation at the metal/dielectric interface:
http://www.ece.rutgers.edu/~orfanidi/ewa/ch08.pdf
Also, search Comsol’ Papers and Presentations website:
http://www.comsol.com/search/?s=surface+plasmon
Regards,
Sergei
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2013年1月18日 GMT-5 16:51
Thank you for your response.... I have one more question regarding this simulation. I'm trying to find the electric field enhancement in metal film with sub wavelength size holes. I was wondering , will it be correct if i make metal film with sub wavelength size hole and apply electric filed with scattering boundary condition. I have confusion on what type of boundary condition should I use.
Thank you for your response.... I have one more question regarding this simulation. I'm trying to find the electric field enhancement in metal film with sub wavelength size holes. I was wondering , will it be correct if i make metal film with sub wavelength size hole and apply electric filed with scattering boundary condition. I have confusion on what type of boundary condition should I use.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2013年1月18日 GMT-5 18:08
if will be correct only for an array of periodic holes
if will be correct only for an array of periodic holes
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2013年2月4日 GMT-5 12:03
Thank you for your response.
While going through some simulation in RF I found that people are using E field value as 1 . I didn't understand whey they are using 1 is it normalized value or something else??
Thank you for your response.
While going through some simulation in RF I found that people are using E field value as 1 . I didn't understand whey they are using 1 is it normalized value or something else??
Sergei Yushanov
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2013年2月4日 GMT-5 12:57
Amplitude of the port field can be specified arbitrary. Comsol calculates internally the actual field amplitude based on the port input power – see Power Flow Normalization section in the RF User Guide.
Regards,
Sergei
Amplitude of the port field can be specified arbitrary. Comsol calculates internally the actual field amplitude based on the port input power – see Power Flow Normalization section in the RF User Guide.
Regards,
Sergei
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2013年2月12日 GMT-5 20:20
Hi,
I was trying to see electric field enhancement in gold nano foil (30nm) with subwavelength size holes (25nm). I had a structure as shown in figure I applied scattering boundary condition and electric filed of E=1 in y axis, I got electric field enhanced up to 4.3 but this is at the center line dividing the structure in 4 parts as seen in figure. I dont know why electric field enhancement is like that and I'm not sure the value I'm getting (4.3) is enhancement in applied electric field by 4.3 times or not.
Hi,
I was trying to see electric field enhancement in gold nano foil (30nm) with subwavelength size holes (25nm). I had a structure as shown in figure I applied scattering boundary condition and electric filed of E=1 in y axis, I got electric field enhanced up to 4.3 but this is at the center line dividing the structure in 4 parts as seen in figure. I dont know why electric field enhancement is like that and I'm not sure the value I'm getting (4.3) is enhancement in applied electric field by 4.3 times or not.