Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
"Magnetic Shielding" boundary condition can not be used in "Magnetic Field" mode?
Posted 2013年10月7日 GMT-4 08:42 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics Version 4.3a 3 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi, everyone,
In the tutorial "One-sidee Magnet and Plate"(www.comsol.com/model/one-sided-magnet-and-plate-213), the magnetic shielding boundary condition is used in Magnetic Field, no current (mfnc) mode.
I wonder whether it is possible to be used in Magnetic Field(mf) mode.
I just try to rebuild this model in mf mode, but the result on the plate is not correct, the mf.normB is much larger than the mfnc.normB, and there is no option for me to choose the normtB, i.e. the tangential component of magnetic flux density parallel to the plate.
When I want to simulate the magnetic saturation, there is no such default variable like mf.tBx which shall corresponds to the mfnc.tHx in this tutorial.
So, anyone could explain this? Or the Magnetic shielding boundary condition is just prepared for magnetostatics?
Any reply is welcome!
In the tutorial "One-sidee Magnet and Plate"(www.comsol.com/model/one-sided-magnet-and-plate-213), the magnetic shielding boundary condition is used in Magnetic Field, no current (mfnc) mode.
I wonder whether it is possible to be used in Magnetic Field(mf) mode.
I just try to rebuild this model in mf mode, but the result on the plate is not correct, the mf.normB is much larger than the mfnc.normB, and there is no option for me to choose the normtB, i.e. the tangential component of magnetic flux density parallel to the plate.
When I want to simulate the magnetic saturation, there is no such default variable like mf.tBx which shall corresponds to the mfnc.tHx in this tutorial.
So, anyone could explain this? Or the Magnetic shielding boundary condition is just prepared for magnetostatics?
Any reply is welcome!
3 Replies Last Post 2013年10月23日 GMT-4 02:42