Edgar J. Kaiser
                                                                                                                                                    Certified Consultant
                                                         
                            
                         
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                1 decade ago                            
                            
                                2013年12月8日 GMT+8 18:45                            
                        
                        
                                                    Hi,
if you are only interested in the field in the air domain you can use electrostatics and just ignore the conductors. You would then use perfectly conducting boundary conditions or just potential boundary conditions.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com                                                
                            Hi,
if you are only interested in the field in the air domain you can use electrostatics and just ignore the conductors. You would then use perfectly conducting boundary conditions or just potential boundary conditions.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
http://www.emphys.com                        
                                                
                                                                                                            
                                             
                                            
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                1 decade ago                            
                            
                                2013年12月8日 GMT+8 21:10                            
                        
                        
                                                    Thank you very much, Edgar, for your quick answer. Yes, I assume your recommendation is a good approach in many cases, either if semiconductor is intrinsic (almost dielectric) or, on the contrary, is highly doped (almost conductor). But actually, I think I have an experimental setup with one of those intermediate cases (it is a TCO, transparent conductive oxide, actually not very conductive).  I'm interested in the electric field close to both surfaces, semiconductor and metal probe, and I find significant differences when considering TCO as a dielectric (just characterised by its permittivity), or as a conductor (total electric field screening), so I would like to know if I can approach even more to the real case. My first option is considering air as a virtual semiconductor with a high gap and residual free carrier density. But I wanted to know if the "semiconductor module" may treat the three domains, dielectric, semiconductor and metal, simultaneously in the same "Model". May be a silly question, I'm a beginner. Thank you very much in advance!                                                
                                                
                            Thank you very much, Edgar, for your quick answer. Yes, I assume your recommendation is a good approach in many cases, either if semiconductor is intrinsic (almost dielectric) or, on the contrary, is highly doped (almost conductor). But actually, I think I have an experimental setup with one of those intermediate cases (it is a TCO, transparent conductive oxide, actually not very conductive).  I'm interested in the electric field close to both surfaces, semiconductor and metal probe, and I find significant differences when considering TCO as a dielectric (just characterised by its permittivity), or as a conductor (total electric field screening), so I would like to know if I can approach even more to the real case. My first option is considering air as a virtual semiconductor with a high gap and residual free carrier density. But I wanted to know if the "semiconductor module" may treat the three domains, dielectric, semiconductor and metal, simultaneously in the same "Model". May be a silly question, I'm a beginner. Thank you very much in advance!                        
                                                
                                                                                                            
                                             
                        
                        
                            
                                                                                        
                                Edgar J. Kaiser
                                                                                                                                                    Certified Consultant
                                                         
                            
                         
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                1 decade ago                            
                            
                                2013年12月8日 GMT+8 23:53                            
                        
                        
                                                    I can't help with the semiconductor module because I don't have it. You might address this to the COMSOL support.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com                                                
                            I can't help with the semiconductor module because I don't have it. You might address this to the COMSOL support.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
http://www.emphys.com